Tuesday, July 17, 2018

General Flynn vs. Peter Strzok: Mounting Evidence of a Vendetta

What a difference a day makes. The evidence is mounting rapidly that this was, indeed, a hit job on General Flynn. I will let everyone read these first two background articles for themselves so that I can get to the real bombshells:



This next article reveals information that, were I in military intelligence, I just might want to find out what was going on:


Skipping past Peter Strzok's family history, the final paragraph brings Uranium One into the picture. Readers will recall from yesterday's article that Strzok Sr., as well as Mark Strzok, both have backgrounds in nuclear activity. The George Webb video (which was also in one of yesterday's links) at the bottom tells a very frightening story of uranium being transferred from Russia to the United States beginning back in 1993. As I listened, I kept asking why on earth we were buying uranium from Russia when we appear to have just turned around and sold it back twenty years later! But when I thought about it for a while, something occurred to me. If this uranium was being brought here, not just to help the Navy but as cover for a nefarious enrichment program, the plan may have been to ship it to Iran. However, the plan did not come to fruition before the administration changed, and with the "War on Terror" starting, and the administration's strong desire to strike Iran, it was temporarily scuttled. Why would this scenario even cross my mind? Because when the opportunity presented itself, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED:


Rumors have swirled around that deal ever since it was made, and since I am not a nuclear expert I do not want to get very far afield. But rumor has it some of the uranium is "missing", and rumor has it the "missing" uranium went to Iran. [NOTE: The Hill article says "Asia"; for those who do not know Iran is in Western Asia (not the Middle East, as I am certain many people believe).] Can I prove it? Of course not. But we are not here to play military intelligence officers. We are here to figure out what Peter Strzok's problem is, so let us continue.

The following article forced me to take a long break to try and calm down:


"EXPOSED: Peter Strzok...Worked as Obama and Brennan's Envoy to Iranian Regime"

Let that sink in. 

I urge my readers to study every single word of that article, but I want to draw your attention to the dates it covers on this subject. 2011 through 2015. Who was Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency for most of that time?

General Flynn.

Do you think he might have been slightly interested in what was happening in Iran? 

YOU BET!

But, we are not quite done. It is time for the piece de resistance. We have been discussing Peter Strzok for a while now, and John Brennan's name keeps rearing its ugly head. But now we add another name:


JOHN. FUCKING. KERRY.

If you are like me, you are now wishing you could just move into a padded room somewhere, safe from the world, with plenty of medication to keep you looped. So, I will allow you to read that article on your own; it has some excellent information on the spy infiltration of the Trump campaign. But, we are getting there, readers. Again, if anyone has anything to add, please comment below or reach me on Twitter at @PizzaGateLibya.

To Be Continued





Monday, July 16, 2018

General Flynn vs. Peter Strzok: Round Two?

...Or, maybe, Round Three?

Since Thursday, with the exception of very short breaks, I have been digging into Peter Strzok's history. There is precious little to be found when searching his name, and his biography, as it were, skips decades at a time. However, thanks to fellow Internet researchers/analysts, I have been able to piece together some disturbing information and, with the help of a couple of extremely experienced and well-qualified friends, have come up with a couple of hypotheses I will share later in this article.

Peter Strzok is an arrogant ass. As I watched him during the joint congressional hearing, I really wanted to knock the man out of his chair! My personal favorite line of his was, "Happy to indulge you." SLAP!!! He exudes "I know more than you do and you are far too stupid to catch me!" It was that attitude that got me reconsidering what happened to General Flynn. Having watched that performance, I found it impossible to believe he did not catch it, yet somehow he fell into Strzok's "trap". I have never, for one minute, believed such a thing happened, but now I know it. So, I decided to take a little trip into Strzok's history. The results are alarming.

Oddly enough, I got this idea from the movie "Thirteen Days". (Don't laugh.) I remembered Kenny O'Donnell trying to figure out if the back channel who had approached the Kennedy administration was genuinely representing Khrushchev. He went to the FBI and compared Khrushchev's biography with the man in question, side-by-side. Lo-and-behold, the two had met while in the military. So, I asked myself the same question. Is it possible General Flynn and Peter Strzok met before the whole "Russian collusion" nonsense began? 

My first stop was Wikipedia, which has precious little to say about the G-man. Next, I found the following post on Reddit:


The first comment gave me a starting point, along with doing a little math to determine Strzok had to have been active duty late 1991/early 1992 through 1995/1996. Next, I began asking questions on Twitter. Before long, someone told me that the 82nd (General Flynn) probably did joint exercises with the 101st (Strzok), but they were not certain. Meanwhile, I was checking various hashtags, and I found the following thread:


Thomas Wictor is a well-known researcher and blogger, and the information in this thread is startling, to say the least. Peter Strzok Sr. worked for a well-known CIA front company (Bell-Textron) in...wait for it...IRAN. He states in the newspaper article that he was a fan of the Ayatollah Khomeini. I will let readers finish that thread on their own, because I need to move on to the next link. This one comes from another researcher and blogger, "SnowWhite7IAM:


Skipping past all of the commentary on the hearing, we reach the following, stunning information: Peter Strzok worked for the FBI and CIA at the same time:


This position was created by Congress in 1996? If so, that would explain why Peter Strzok was on the Joint Secret Service/CIA Task force. I urge readers to go through this thread very carefully, along with the following related Reddit:


So now that I had a launching point, I began doing some independent searches and came up with the following, very disturbing article:


Let us walk through this. The first thing we see is Haiti. Hold onto your hats for that one; we will return to it in just a moment. Then the writer begins tracing Peter Strzok's family tree and, boy, is it interesting. And very frightening. Iran. CIA. Nuclear reactors. General James Cartwright (related by marriage). Stuxnet (the computer worm allegedly planted in Iran by the Israelis, said information having been leaked by Cartwright):


We also have Kenya. Late-night meetings at the White House. Melissa's promotion to the SEC at a very suspicious time. Peter Jr. being the last one to see the Datto server. The rest of the article covers possible connections to Barack Obama, but it is slightly off the topic of this post. 

Back to Haiti. In my endeavor to determine whether-or-not General Flynn and Peter Strzok ever crossed paths in the Army, someone brought up Operation Uphold Democracy:


As readers will note, the 101st joined the 82nd in that operation. Does that necessarily mean the two men meet in Haiti? No, but the person went on to mention Fort Polk, home of the Joint Readiness Training Center (JRTC):


Could they have met there? We might be able to figure that out if we had Strzok's full biography instead of that threadbare Wikipedia article. Either way, given Peter Strzok Sr.'s involvement with Catholic Relief Services (a rumored CIA front), it is pretty much a given that, by the time of the earthquake and the subsequent Haiti Relief Fund being raided by the Clintons, I believe we have enough "there, there" to warrant further investigation:


I have every reason to believe I am on track when I assert there was some other motive in Peter Strzok's treatment of General Flynn other than "just" hating this administration, and I will be digging further starting right after I finish this post. I firmly believe this is the key to clearing General Flynn's name. Please stay tuned and, if any of my readers has information that would help, please feel free to post a comment. I can also be reached on Twitter at @PizzaGateLibya.

To Be Continued 






Thursday, July 5, 2018

General Flynn: The Truth Explodes

Wednesday morning I saw a Twitter thread that sent my mind spinning:


The information is well-researched and well-written. I am not going to regurgitate nor rewrite; rather, I would like to include my own thoughts based upon two days of weeding through it. I encourage my readers to follow along and, while time-consuming, do their own digging. 

[NOTE: I HIGHLY RECOMMEND readers open Mr. Carlson's article side-by-side with mine as you read.]

First, when I read about Mission Ridge and Integrity Applications Incorporated (IAI), my mind went to the Department of Defense and CIA. More on that as we get further into the information presented. Let me just ask the reader to suspend judgment as to whether or not IAI is a "private contractor". 

The next tweet in the thread contains this article:


Incredible work by Jeff Carlson, CFA. For whatever reason, I did not know about "The Market Works" until this week. Many thanks to Nick Weil for educating me. 

Now, let us go through some of the astounding facts Mr. Carlson presents. Why is it the same names keep popping up? We barely begin this article before we see Mueller, Yates, Lynch (AG), and Clapper (DNI). Enter Admiral Mike Rogers who, as you will see, was brilliant. Readers will recall the report that James Clapper and Ash Carter (SECDEF) demanded Rogers be fired after his visit to Trump Tower on November 17th. As we shall see, Clapper made this demand one month earlier, at the same time Admiral Rogers reported FISA abuses to the FISC. (I am sure this was mere coincidence.) 

The next thing we notice is DOJ's and FBI's flagrant disregard of OIG Horowitz' request for oversight of the National Security Division at Justice, spearheaded by Sally Yates. So in April, 2016, Rogers stops "all outside contractor access to raw FISA data". (Sorry, guys. There are no page numbers here. I hope you are following along.) Remember that Peter Strzok was planning a trip to Mission Ridge in September, 2016? As we go through the timeline presented we see that, after the first FISA request was denied, the second was granted on October 21, 2016. Based upon what? The Fusion GPS so-called "dossier", which was commissioned by Perkins Coie between April and October of 2016. Perkins Coie is counsel of record for the DNC:


Unfortunately, Admiral Rogers did not get to the FISA court until October 26th, five days after the FBI had completed its end run around his order. Obviously, he realizes this so, on November 17th he visits President-Elect Trump. THAT SAME DAY, Trump moves his transition team out of Trump Tower. 

My impression at this point in the article is, the intelligence community (IC) was in an all-out war with Admiral Rogers, and I believe the data supports my impression. So far we have DOJ, the FBI, and the DNI all doing whatever-in-hell they want, inspectors general and NSA be damned. (Don't worry; CIA shows up shortly.) 

As to John Carlin, I have one word: Chickenshit.

DOJ's withholding of the IG's report of January 7, 2016 is nothing short of contempt of court. It is prosecutorial misconduct, worthy of sanctions. As we go on, let us recall the outrage when the American public discovered the NSA was collecting metadata! Citizens wanted the NSA burned to the ground! Yet, here we have umpteen violations of the Fourth Amendment, and we hear nary a whisper. 

"The NSA was unable to ascertain all the various avenues by which raw FISA data was accessed." This is where IAI, Fusion GPS and, I submit, CIA enter the picture. Readers will recall the release of Vault 7 by Wikileaks, showing all of the various tools that Julian Assange alleged were being used against American citizens. Unfortunately, someone has decided to shut off his access to the public so we cannot ask him about it. 

"FISA abuses were ongoing from at least November 1, 2015 through May 1, 2016. They almost certainly started earlier." Maybe around the time Donald Trump formally announced his candidacy for President of the United States on June 16, 2015? Peter Strzok: "No, no [Trump] won't. We'll stop it." How is he so cock-sure? 

I wish I had paper copies (not computer-generated) of the redactions. The blacked-out portions would be quite easy to read. As a matter of fact, I tried several times with the query violation table at the beginning of Mr. Carlson's article and I could just make out the difference between the overlaid black and the print beneath. Maybe if I were younger and my eyes were better I could do it. Regardless, we can make some educated guesses. "Private contractors, employed by the FBI, were given full access to raw FISA data." Again, the assumption that [redacted] is a "private contractor". How do we know that? It is common knowledge that CIA, while prohibited from operating against American citizens on U.S. soil, does PRECISELY THAT through front businesses. Maybe, like IAI and Fusion GPS?  I have my suspicions. 

Let us skip down close to the end. "The [Russia] report was technically created by a joint effort between the CIA...FBI...and the NSA...and assembled by the DNI...."

This report stated, "CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has only moderate confidence." For those who are unfamiliar with the world of the IC, CIA and FBI seem to have a habit of working together, and I for one find CIA's glaring absence from most of this to be highly suspicious. How could John Brennan determine anything if he was just sitting on his hands? BTW, it is also well-known the CIA and the Pentagon work closely together. I wonder what Ash Carter was doing, besides demanding Admiral Rogers be fired? On what did he base that demand? Again, these are my thoughts; I cannot prove it (although I wish I could).

I leave it to far more well-trained and brilliant minds than mine to go into all of the nuances of this outrageous activity. The reason for my article is that EVERYTHING THAT WAS COLLECTED BASED UPON THE FISA WARRANT AND SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS WAS OBTAINED ILLEGALLY, and therefore any and all investigations and subsequent indictments based upon that warrant are "fruit of the poisonous tree" and are NULL AND VOID. First and foremost, General Flynn's "confession" was extracted in violation of Brady:


Not only was the investigation tainted, but prosecutors failed to disclose exculpatory evidence (not the least of which was the FBI's own admission, via James Comey, that he was NOT found to be untruthful).

General Flynn's continued legal trouble is insane. It is a travesty. It is a war against a man who has done NOTHING but serve this country with distinction and honor. A court-of-martial would be appalled, and a first-year JAG would wipe the floor with this "case"! The plea agreement should be thrown out WITH PREJUDICE (meaning the government can never raise the issue again), and Judge Sullivan should send General Flynn home with his deepest apologies.

Let us pray he does.




The Only True Way to End Racism