Monday, December 26, 2016

#Benghazi = #PizzaGate: #Syria

The plot thickens. Just before James Alefantis visited the White House the Clinton Global Initiative held a three-day Annual Meeting at which Barack Obama spoke, talking about his administration's efforts to eradicate human trafficking:


Certainly this is not enough to get a conviction in a court-of-law, but the timing is very suspicious. First the attack in Benghazi. Then a speech about human trafficking. Then Alefantis gets the irresistible urge to visit Michelle Lee at the White House...two days in a row. (I believe this is Michelle J. Lee, the press assistant. There is also a Michelle K. Lee, but she is Undersecretary of Commerce.) The person who posted the above link is wrong about one thing: Alefantis did not stay for over twenty-four hours. The log is clear that he came back on the 27th and signed in again. (FYI: It appears the computer automatically logs people out at 12:59:59 every night, so we do not know exactly what time he left the night of the 26th.)



There is much more, and this is where I become extremely angry because I defended General David Petraeus when he had his Paula Broadwell scandal. In fact, when the news broke I said, "I wonder how long someone has had that photo in his back pocket just waiting for the right time?" Unfortunately, it appears our "war hero" with the unblemished reputation up until that incident is not so unblemished after all. People kept showing me photographs of Petraeus in Doha, Qatar, but I thought, "CIA. Covert ops. Maybe he is spying on them." Optimism in this business is not warranted.

It seems Petraeus was arranging for the transport of sarin gas (obtained from Gaddafi's stash) from Qatar to Amman, Jordan (via C-130's), from where it was trucked into Syria. In other words, he committed a war crime that resulted in the deaths of 1,500 Syrians:



So what was the purpose of creating these false flag attacks in Syria? The same as the goal in Libya; to destabilize the country. Although the plan failed, the results have been a Clinton Foundation dream. There are currently over thirty-five terrorist organizations in Syria, fighting each other, switching allegiances every five minutes, and the result? Refugees. And refugees provide the people necessary for human trafficking. According to German police, there are currently 9,000 children missing from the "refugees", and they fear the children have fallen prey to--you guessed it--trafficking gangs. And this figure is only from Germany! Europol puts the figure at over 10,000 missing in Europe, which many say is a "conservative figure":




Did Ambassador Stevens stumble upon this plan? We may never know, but it is interesting that the last person with whom he met before the terrorist attack (Ali Sait Akin) is not only well-known as an arms trafficker but is rumored to be involved in human trafficking as well. And Stevens' death is not the only one I question. On May 30, 2013, Steven Sotloff tweeted that sarin gas was falling into the hands of Jabhat al-Nusra (which if everyone recalls, swore allegiance to ISIS). For some reason, my screen capture button is not working, but his Twitter account is still available for everyone to see for themselves. 

The Clinton Foundation seems to have its hand in just about every dirty deed on the planet from which money can be made. Oil, weapons, people; they all appear to be the same to the Hillary Clinton crowd. And let me just add one more note here, as I realize there are still many skeptics out there and this may be my last article before I leave for Washington. George Webb has done incredible work on Benghazi and the Clinton Foundation, and is currently doing a series on Eric Braverman in which he is going back over information that has been accumulated over past years. Even he has reached the point where he can no longer ignore PizzaGate, and he was an even bigger skeptic than I was (see my original post on the subject "Insanity"):



All of this begs the question: Why did Barry back down from his "red line"? If readers recall that fiasco, it left everyone shaking their heads at the time. First, Ghouta. Then John Kerry pounds podiums red-faced swearing justice will be done. Barry is oddly silent. Meanwhile, four ships move into the Mediterranean and pundits take to cable news announcing their payloads, probable targets, the length of the first wave, when we would pause for an assessment, what we would do during a second wave...they released everything but the social security numbers of the crews! I was astonished. Israel responded by moving their Iron Dome battery for the inevitable retaliatory strike after we hit Syria, and then John Kerry had his "slip-of-the-tongue" and allowed Vladimir Putin to ride to the rescue. Why? The Iran Deal. Barry was not about to jeopardize it, not even for Hillary Clinton. Nevertheless, the results were the same. A humanitarian crisis that has not only unleashed terrorists on Europe (and here in the U.S.; make no mistake, it is coming) but has provided human traffickers with plenty of victims.

This must be stopped. No wonder FBIAnon says the IC is fed up. Let us hope I am able to fulfill my agenda when I reach Washington.