A History of Pogroms and the Holocaust Part Three - Islam

According to Mark Twain, Palestine" was "desolate" in the late 1800's. When Jews slowly began returning to Eretz Yisrael, they were very knowledgeable about agriculture and began reviving the land. As soon as Arabs began to see this wasteland becoming an oasis, they decided to migrate.

[For the sake of brevity I must leave out much detail. Perhaps I will need to write a Part Four.]

After World War I, the Balfour Declaration was signed, and the Jewish Homeland was established. Jews migrated by the hundreds of thousands. Arabs also migrated, and before long tensions arose. The British, at a loss for how to deal with the situation, began limiting Jewish migration, interned the Jews, ultimately deciding to deport some of them, and they tried to appease the Arabs.

Enter Hajj Amin al-Husseini.

The British had appointed him the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in hopes he would calm the Arab population. This move proved to be devastating for the Jewish people:

 https://vimeo.com/69991225

The above video omits a very important event, the Hebron Massacre of 1929. The Mufti had established rules for how and when Jews could pray on the Temple Mount, considered by the Arabs to be a "holy site". How it came to be a "holy site" in Islam remains a mystery. The only connection I am aware of is that, while Mohammad was on his way to "Paradise", his imaginary flying horse became tethered to the Western Wall. Go figure.

Anyway, on a hot day, Jews went to the Temple Mount to pray. As the heat became overwhelming the elderly began to sit down, which was forbidden. In order to keep Jewish derrieres from touching Islam's "holy site", people began bringing in chairs for them to use. That was not good enough. The Arabs became enraged and a pogrom began in Hebron, where Jews and Arabs had lived peacefully together for years until that day. Jews were killed "each according to his work", meaning bakers were baked in their own ovens, scholars' heads were pierced and their brains used for kick balls, and so on. All of this with the Mufti's blessing.

Enter Hitler.

Al-Husseini was fascinated by Hitler and saw in him a solution to the Arabs' problem. Reciprocally, Hitler had a fascination with Islam:

http://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-ataturk-in-the-nazi-imagination-by-stefan-ihrig-and-islam-and-nazi-germanys-war-by-david-motadel-1421441724

The two had a common goal: Get rid of the Jews. Why? In part because of a KGB publication called "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", which was written to promote anti-Semitism after the Bolshevik Revolution, which Arabs consider to be a factual account, and which Hitler quoted repeatedly in "Mein Kampf". To that end, they formed an alliance that culminated in the "Final Solution". The Mufti oversaw Himmler's Muslim armies in Yugoslavia, Bosnia, and Kosovo as they committed mass genocide. As the video explains, such massacres continued after the end of World War II.
The Russians wrote the "Protocols" to scapegoat the Jews after losing the Bolshevik Revolution. That book now sits on the shelves of the vast majority of Arabs in the Middle East. They, as did Hitler, believe it to be a true account of a meeting of Zionists during which they discuss their plans to take over the world. It is yet another blood libel (discussed in the first two parts of this series), and has intensified hatred towards the Jews for a full century.

Now, I ask my readers this: ISIS claims to have 4,000 fighters amongst the four million "Syrian Refugees" flooding Europe. With recruitment while in transit, that number has multiplied exponentially.

Do we want a repeat of the Holocaust? If so, accept the so-called "Syrian Refugees". If not, CLOSE THE BORDERS.

For more information, see the following links:

http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/hitler-muslim-brotherhood.html

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/muftihit.html

 

http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com/gallery/

http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/recruited.html



A History of Pogroms and the Holocaust - Part Two

By the time the rumblings of World War II began, Jews had spent 2,000 years roaming around the globe looking for a home. After living under Roman occupation and having over 100,000 of them crucified, Jews were forcibly expelled from their homeland and slowly driven to the north as country-after-country expelled them. An estimated 20 million Jews had been butchered "in the name of Jesus".

In order to understand the Holocaust, in order to understand the questions I had for decades, we must all first understand those 2,000 years. A man whom I love, admire, and respect, and from whom I have learned so very much led me to that knowledge. It was Thanksgivukkah, and Prime Minister Netanyahu went to visit the Vatican. During that visit, he gave the Pope a book written by his father. I knew his father had recently died, so the gift seemed to be rather personal, piquing my curiosity. So, I went to the library and checked out "Origins of the Inquisition" by Ben-Zion Netanyahu.

That book is not an easy read, neither from a collegiate standpoint, nor an emotional one. It is not a book one should read at bedtime.

It is abhorrent. Appalling. Horrific. Indescribably so.

I had heard of pogroms. I knew they involved killing Jews. I never knew the details. Professor Netanyahu painstakingly outlines those details, listing pogrom-after-pogrom from 38 C.E. to 1492. No, he does not lambaste Christianity. He does not have to.

The excuses for these atrocities varied; here is a partial list:

 

http://www.livius.org/am-ao/antisemitism/antisemitism01.html

 

For over 2,000 years, Jews have been expelled from cities and countries, had their homes and synagogues burned down, the Talmud confiscated and burned; they have been tortured, beaten, mutilated, dismembered, dragged through the streets until nothing was left of their corpses (I have actually seen that on video. The location was Gaza, only in this case the Hamas were on motorcycles.), stoned, lynched, locked inside of buildings and burned alive, and marched en masse into lighted pyres.

Thus, by the time Hitler came along it was not a surprise. The shock was only the size of this pogrom.

So, why did Jews have gold, antiquities, paintings, and other valuables hidden away? Because they are greedy, filthy Jews? Or was it because they knew it was only a matter of time before the next pogrom? Why did they give up their homes to the Nazis? Why shouldn't they? Jews had been giving up their homes for 2,000 years. Why did they get on the trucks without a fight (with rare exceptions)? They were being relocated...again. Why did they allow themselves to be herded onto trains and packed in like sardines? Well, they had to get to their new homes somehow.

And, why did they line up on ditches and obediently wait to get shot? I imagine there is more than one answer to that question. Perhaps they were tired. Perhaps they knew that being shot was the least painful of the alternative methods to which they had been subjected. Or, most horrifically, maybe they believed this was really "it", the end of the Jewish people. Perhaps they had reconciled themselves to their "fate".

But, there was hope at the end of the nightmare that was the Holocaust. One man set it into motion decades earlier. No, it was no one named "Rothschild". No, it was not even Lord Balfour. It was Sir Winston Churchill, who had watched the Jewish people in Great Britain and admired their industriousness and zeal for life. There had been a great influx of Jewish refugees, and anti-Semitism was rising. His own political party wanted to stop the flow and even begin the process of relocating them. He broke ranks in 1904 and switched to the Labour Party. He pictured what became the Mandate for Palestine thirteen years before the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Balfour Declaration. Thank God for him.

 

The person who asked me to write more about the Holocaust did so because he did not know that Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, was involved. In Part Three, I will address the role of Islam in World War II.

A History of Pogroms and the Holocaust - Part One

I have been asked to write more on the Holocaust, so here it is. First, my earlier discussion of it:

http://ladonnarae1961.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-real-barack-obama-part-one-cultural.html

In my old blog, I wrote of how Israel has affected my life. In one post, I commented more extensively:

http://ladonnarae50.blogspot.com/2013/12/chapter-one-introduction_8.html

That post generated some irate backlash. People thought I was blaming Jews for the Holocaust. Nothing could be further from the truth. I was simply aghast that people would just lie down and die without a fight. I did not understand the psychology. But, that was before I learned about Jewish history, and specifically the history of pogroms. At some point, it became passe to blame Jews for everything under the Sun, and at some point Jews became resigned to their "fate".

Most people have read about Israel's enslavement by Egypt, and their fights with the Babylonians, the Philistines, etc. But, those were "Old Testament" days, and there is no real emotional impact from reading those stories. Pogroms are different. Let me list just a few of the more than 2,000 pogroms that have occurred since 38 C.E.:

Alexandria, 38:

http://www.livius.org/am-ao/antisemitism/antisemitism01.html

France and Germany, 1096:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhineland_massacres

Spain, 1391:

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/112389/jewish/The-Massacres-of-5151.htm

Astorga, 1491:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Muslim_presence_in_the_Iberian_Peninsula

Lisbon, 1506:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisbon_Massacre

Seville, 1660:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_the_Ottoman_Empire

Kiev, 1768:

http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CJ%5CE%5CJews.htm

Russia, 1919:

http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Russsian_Civil_War_pogroms.htm

Remember, the atrocities above are but a small fraction of everything the Jewish people have suffered. A very small fraction. When one realizes just how frequent these attacks were, and how brutal, it is easy to see how this people, this great people, were so beaten down mentally and emotionally that they had come to expect to be slaughtered. What an atrocious thing to consider, but it is true. This paved the way for what was to come during World War II.

PART TWO TOMORROW

For a longer list of pogroms, see:

http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/HistoryJewishPersecution/

Gays Win "Marriage"; KGB Wins War

The subversion of our country is complete. With Friday's 5-4 ruling upholding gay “marriage” our destruction is virtually guaranteed. I was in New York City recently, and Times Square is riddled with openly-gay and transgender people. What was comedy in the 1980's in a movie called “Crocodile Dundee” is now a sick, twisted reality, only it is not necessary to grab anyone by the crotch to find out if the person is a biological male or female. The grotesque distortions of God's design are on display for the world to see. Those who still believe that this is about one person's right to “love” another should spend some time sitting on the corner of 42^nd and 8^th. Utter perversion. The SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) mentioned “dignity” in its ruling. There is no dignity on 42^nd street, and I am certain neither in Haight-Ashbury (San Francisco), the French Quarter (New Orleans), nor any other area of the country where men have been transformed into a demented version of women, and women attempt to imitate men only to become an angry-looking reject of everything that is considered to be feminine. Men and women both wear their pants down around their knees, inviting what until now were considered to be sick sexual acts. Who in their right mind would want to visit the new Sodom and Gomorrah? Justice Kennedy got one thing right: Marriage is a “keystone of our social order”. That order is now gone.

In Subversion: America on the Brink, I said the United States no longer exists:

http://ladonnarae1961.blogspot.com/2015/06/subversion-america-on-brink.html

Friday's “landmark ruling” proved me right.

It gets worse from there. After the shooting in Charleston, calls came for the removal (censorship) of the Confederate flag. At first, I really did not see the harm. Personally, I have always found it to be distasteful. I would not want to see Swastikas flying over a courthouse. But, on the heels of that demand came calls to remove statues and other historic symbols. Subversion strikes again. It is as though the Useful Idiots are sharks who smell blood, a lot of blood, to the point that they are throwing caution to the wind and pouncing on every opportunity to eradicate any semblance of what this once-great-nation used to represent.

And then there is today. As I write this, New York City is having a gay pride parade, as is San Francisco. On a Sunday. As a Jew, I know the Sabbath is on Saturday, but America goes by the Christian/Roman calendar which claims the first day of the week as the Sabbath. It is no coincidence Sunday was chosen for this salute to abomination, and I can foresee where we will go from here. As soon as the parties subside, the gay community will begin putting this Supreme Court ruling to good use. Expect homosexuals to begin demanding Christian churches hold gay weddings. While that will not be a problem for Presbyterians (who have advocated for gay marriage and have already been performing them), other churches will be faced with lawsuits should they not comply with these demands. Christian schools that receive federal funds will be forced to recognize “mommy and mommy” and “daddy and daddy” parents, under threat of lawsuits as well as the withdrawal of federal funds. And so on.

Justice Roberts appeared to regain his sanity with his dissent to Obergefell et. al. v. Hodges after his nonsensical affirmation of Obamacare earlier in the week, telling the prevailing party to:

“Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”

Then Justice Alito hit the proverbial nail right on the head:

“The implications of this analogy (referring to the use of civil rights struggles of the past) will be exploited by those who are determined to stamp out every vestige of dissent.”

In other words, the final stage of subversion. The New York Times published a chart in its Saturday edition (June 27, 2015) showing how the gay lobby had laid the “groundwork” for Friday's decision over the course of the past 23 years (1992 – present), oddly coinciding with the time frame mentioned by Yuri Bezmenov. Remember?

http://ladonnarae1961.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-real-barack-obama-part-one-cultural.html

Nikita Khrushchev was right. Russia has conquered America without firing a single shot.

 

 

 

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Part Five - Mystery Solved!

EUREKA! The "noise" has lessened considerably. "The unions hate TAA." "The unions want TAA." "No, they do not." "Yes, they do." What in the world? The Democrats hate a bill that protects workers? Republicans want a bill that trade unions support? Boy, was I confused!

Thank goodness for Politico Magazine.

When we hear the term "trade unions" we think of one large umbrella under which all workers fall. That was my fallacy. In fact, like all special interests, different unions have different objectives, and that was the error in my thinking that was causing such confusion. For the sake of discussion I will divide "trade unions" into two categories, working class and big business, even though many of those that fall under "big business" are in fact manufacturing jobs and thus also considered to be "working class". Further, let us assign the "working class" to the AFL-CIO, and "big business" to George Soros. We will now see things much more clearly.

What happened last Friday in Congress was not a clash of Republicans vs. Democrats. It appeared to be, but something else was going on behind the scenes. Democrats were being pressured by both the AFL-CIO unions and the Soros unions, both of which contribute heavily to the Democratic Party. George Soros, and thus his unions, want the TPP desperately, as does Barack Obama. On the other hand, as I stated in the Introduction the unions represented by the AFL-CIO are concerned about the loss of lower-skilled manufacturing jobs that will thin the ranks of their unions and thus cost them money. So, as some Democrats came out in favor of the TPA the AFL-CIO became angry and resorted to some dirty politics:

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/democrats-angry-labor-trade-deal-attacks-119154.html?hp=b1_l1 

This angered Democrats in Congress, and they retaliated by saying "no" to the TAA they had lobbied for in the first place. Politics. So, things are not as insane as they have appeared to be. It is business-as-usual in Washington, watching the purse strings and trying to placate those that help keep our representatives in power. In fact, Democrats do want the TAA, and the TPA, and the TPP. It is the segment of those who represent the working class trade unions that is causing the disruption (which, in my opinion, is a good thing). So, in actuality there has been no break between the President and his base. The break is between the Democrats and a portion of their base.

The Republicans are also watching their purse strings. The other day, I read that George Soros contributed a half-million dollars to the House Majority Committee. Who is the majority in both houses of Congress? The Republicans. So, like Russia, George Soros is playing both sides. He has invested heavily and is about to reap the rewards of those investments. He has Republicans concerned about big business, and he has Democrats concerned about trade unions. Both sides are now in agreement with Soros' plan, but for different ideological reasons. And of course, the bottom line is the Almighty Dollar.

What are these competing interests? The AFL-CIO represents a wide variety of unions:

http://www.aflcio.org/About/AFL-CIO-Unions 

We have everything from teachers, to postal workers, to pilots, to football players, to machinists, to engineers, to masons and mine workers. Obviously, not all of these industries will be affected adversely by the TPP, but it is easy to see which laborers will be in danger once international competition is opened further. The Longshoremen's Union is extremely powerful, as is the IAMAW (International Administration of Machinists and Aeronautical Workers), the Teacher's Union, and others.

Conversely, here is just one of the unions sponsored by George Soros, the SEIU (Service Employees International Union):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_Employees_International_Union 

Health care, public services, and property services, representing workers in both the United States and Canada. These are also very powerful lobbies, with implications that are more far-reaching, as we will see in my next post regarding the TPP and pharmaceuticals. George Soros has his ducks all lined up.

While we still need to find a way out of this mess, at least it is reassuring to know that everything is the way it has always been in Washington.

SNAFU.

 

 

CORRECTION: The House Majority Fund is a Democratic PAC. Thank you to the reader who brought that to my attention. This information does not change my overall assessment, however. The Republicans rely upon contributions from many of the same businesses in which George Soros invests. For example, Ted Cruz is from Texas. Soros is an investor in Halliburton (and I am certain many other oil companies; I will check on that and follow-up at a later date). So, the original assessment stands. Congress is looking at next year's election, and they need money in order to win their respective races. As a result, ethics and principles have gone out the proverbial window.



The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Part Four - Intellectual Property

Before I get into today's TPP topic, I need to address the anticipated vote on TAA/TPA. I have so many questions. As recently as Monday, the New York Times was reporting the same partisan voting lines on the Trade Adjustment Assistance legislation as I described in the Introduction:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/us/questions-and-answers-about-the-trans-pacific-partnership.html?smid=tw-share 

What happened last Friday?! Democrats insisted the TAA be attached to the TPA (Trade Promotion Authority, AKA "Fast Track") bill, then they broke ranks with Obama and rejected it. Why? It is almost as if they set up the Republicans, but to what end? And why are Republicans overwhelmingly supporting legislation they would ordinarily reject?

Has something gone wrong with the original plan? Has Obama been set up? Is the reason WikiLieaks has been releasing this information because Russia is trying to stop the TPP? In that case, Putin is protecting China, but what of George Soros? Has Russia turned on its own?

For those who are reading my blog for the first time, I encourage you to read the first three parts of this series. I am not arguing in favor of the TAA, nor the TPA. Both are bad for America, and the TPA is flat-out unconstitutional. I am simply trying to understand this completely dysfunctional government. It is not making any sense to me. Reports are that Obama has never lobbied for anything as hard in his presidency as he has for the TPP, yet he does not have his own party lined up. Even Nancy Pelosi has turned on him. What is the story?

Yesterday, I mentioned intellectual property rights, and coincidentally something happened on Twitter that raised more questions. I believe everyone can agree that we are entitled to have our work protected by law. If I invent or create something, I am entitled to the fruits of my labor. But, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement appears to carry things a little too far. One major problem is the fact that individuals are elevated to nation status, which means if a country infringes on my copyright I can sue that government, and the lawsuit will not go to the World Court but rather to a tribunal. I seem to recall a ballyhoo over tribunals when it came to the War on Terror, but no one is screaming about this.

For legal purposes, a corporation is considered as an individual. So, if for example a company George Soros has based in Singapore decides America has infringed on a patent, he can sue America. That lawsuit will be tried in a tribunal made up of the twelve nations of the TPP:

Brunei, Chile, New Zealand, Singapore, United States, Australia, Peru, Vietnam, Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, and Japan

In other words, a kangaroo court. Does anyone have chills going up and down his or her spine yet? Talk about being set up.

Last night, someone sent me a video on Twitter from "across the pond" for amusement. Instead of playing, I got a message saying it was blocked "for copyright protection". What if that video had been produced by Soros in a TPP-member nation and inadvertently the video had played? Instant lawsuit, only he would not sue me. He would sue the American government as well as the originating country for failing to protect his copyright, and since he has holdings around the world he pretty much owns that kangaroo court.

The length of time being proposed for the protection of property rights is also bothersome: Seventy years post-mortem. So, Alex can carry on his father's legacy until his own death and pass it along to his children for a total of seven decades after George passes on. That is quite a dynasty. And wait until you see just how far the Soros tentacles reach.

 

TO BE CONTINUED

 

LINK TO THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership 

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Part Three - Currency Manipulation

Before I begin, please allow me to apologize. I warned readers in the introduction that this series would raise more questions than answers. No one is more frustrated than myself, but I continue to hope that as I lay this out things will fall into place. However, right now I am completely perplexed as to why Republicans have become Democrats, and Democrats, Republicans.

But, I also said I smell George Soros, and I do. Subversion. This is why the entire situation is backwards. It is by design, to confuse. Let us try and shed light upon it.

Let me say one other thing. As I try desperately to sort through the insanity I realize some in Congress are being blackmailed. I know the Obama administration has something on John Boehner. That is the only explanation for his behavior. My question is: Where are his balls? I saw a movie when I was a child. It was a true story about Audie Murphy called "To Hell and Back", where he portrayed himself as an Army soldier during World War II. There was a point in the film where someone commented that he was "dangerous" because he "had nothing to lose". See, that is where I am. I have skeletons; we all do. The difference is, some of us do not care. We do not care. We make the decision that some things are more important than ourselves, and that is where I am. I only wish Congress would reach the same place.

The topic du jour is currency manipulation, because of the following article that posted yesterday:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/no-wonder-obama-wont-let-us-read-tpp/#QjcZM1APeVdGmVCy.99 

The Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement does not address currency manipulation? That alone is enough for me to say "no", without even addressing pharmaceuticals and how intellectual property rights will cause the cost of drugs to skyrocket around the world, killing God-only-knows how many people. George Soros specializes in currency manipulation. Just ask Great Britain:

http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/george-soros-bank-of-england.asp 

Soros has destroyed four countries with this very technique:

http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2012/02/20/the-real-george-soros-an-evil-despicable-excuse-for-a-human-being-no-wonder-the-libs-love-the-pos/ 

Do my readers remember what he said about his plans to devalue the American dollar? He said he wanted "controlled devaluation". I posted the link in my last blog discussing him:

http://ladonnarae1961.blogspot.com/2015/06/george-soros-kgb.html 

Before anyone says, "George Soros is going to die soon; aren't you being paranoid?", let me introduce everyone to his son, Alex:

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/george-soros-son-builds-a-pac-for-jewish-voters-117161.html 

Why is the son of an avowed Jew-hater pandering to the leftist Jewish community? Because they are the Useful Idiots. These are the people who hate Zionism (i.e. Israel), and embrace the Hamas terrorist organization as being "freedom fighters". More subversion. Do people think Soros' legacy will die with him? Not a chance.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement will affect two-thirds of the world's economy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ6FM-o8Ixs 

We are in very dangerous territory. More in my next post.